Nicole Fox Fenlon, a 21
years old Irish lady affectionately known as Coco to her friends and family
died in January 2018 by suicide after suffering years of awful physical and
online abuse. Jackie Fox, her mother exposed that the physical and online bullying
had continued even after Nicole had tried to take her own life in 2016. The abusers
made fake Facebook pages, they pressed her all the time through Snapchat,
WhatsApp and Messenger to go and hang herself. They even sent her videos of a
noose, showing how to hang herself. The abusers used online platforms because they
knew they would get away with it that way as there was no law to prevent and penalise
online harassment then. As a result, Jackie converted her unbearable grief
into changing the laws around online harm and fighting tirelessly to legislate a
stringent legislation to criminalise persistent online abuse that could better
protect others from online bullying, abuse, digital harassment, cyberstalking and
revenge porn.
Section 57 of the controversial ICT Act
provides that anyone can be punished for any false and obscene posts online for
a maximum of 10 years of imprisonment and maximum fine of taka 1 crore although
it does not define the term ‘obscene’. The Pornography Control Act, 2012
makes it a crime if anybody entices any woman, man or child to participate in
producing pornography and captures still images or videography of that with or
without his knowledge under section 8(1). Furthermore, the Act has
provision to penalize a person who harms the social or personal dignity
of another person through pornography, or extorts money or any other benefit
through fear, or mentally tortures through pornography recorded knowingly or
unknowingly of that person (S. 8(2)). Distribution of pornography through
internet, website, mobile phone or any other electronic device is also
prohibited under section 8(3) the mentioned Act. Nevertheless, the Act focused
only on pornography, not even revenge porn or other aspects of online sexual harassment.
Again
section 29(1) of the debated DSA merely penalizes dissemination of defamatory
contents on online platforms whereas there is no mention about sharing or
threat to sharing intimate photos or videos.
However, Coco’s law aims to prosecute the evolving forms of digital harassment by amending the previous concepts and provides anonymity to the victims of those crimes. Consequently, sharing or threatening to share intimate image online without consent and with or without intent to cause harm to the victim is a now a crime in Ireland. Intimate image denotes to a person’s underwear covered or not intimate part of body like genitals, buttocks, anal region and breasts, or a person who is nude or someone engaged in sexual activity. It is irrelevant whether the person in the image willingly took it and sent it to someone they trusted, if it is then shared with others without consent. It also includes a picture taken or content recorded without the knowledge of the person in the image. The punishment for this offence is up to seven years in prison and an unlimited fine. The law also recognizes it a crime which is often referred to as a ‘deep fake’ i.e send an intimate image purporting or claiming to be of another person even if the image is not actually of them.
The recording,
distribution or publication of intimate image is also a punishable crime under
the law, even if the person who records, distributes or publishes the image
without consent, does not need to have intended to cause harm. It will be
sufficient that the taking, recording or distribution of the intimate image seriously
affected the other person’s peace and privacy or caused them harm, alarm or
distress.
Now, the question
is how long shall we wait for a Coco’s law in Bangladesh? Aren’t we hearing the
misogyny of hundreds of thousands of victims of online sexual abuse and/or exposed
intimate photo/video victims or shall we waiting for another Nicole Coco to
dedicate her life to catch the attention of the legislators? In light of the sheer volume of digital
sexual harassment in virtual world, a proper legislative mechanism should be
considered to address the issue urgently.
It is true that there
is no shame in someone's body rather it is reprehensible to threaten people by
demonising their personal lives. However, this is high time to build safer
digital Bangladesh by firstly recognizing these common offences happened on online
platforms regularly and enact a new legislation like Coco’s law containing
provisions penalizing all new forms of digital sexual harassment and a regulatory
framework for prevention of these crimes from being circulated on social and
communication media platforms. Moreover, the law has to create an easy and
accessible complaint mechanism for all the victims of non-consensual distribution of private and/or intimate images maintaining
anonymity. Additionally, the law should insert provision for conducting the proceedings in camera
and ensuring that the victims do not have to undergo additional harassment from
state institutions. Otherwise, the offenders will get immunity in absence of a
concrete law and turn the virtual world of digital Bangladesh into a heaven for
digital sexual harassment.
Published in the Desh Rupantor as Sub Editorial on 18 March 2023 on Page 4.
Published in the Dainik Bangla as Sub Editorial on 21 March 2023 on Page 8.
Published in the Progress Magazine as an Article in the November 2023 Issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment